<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now with more LinkedIn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drewperry.com/digidad/2008/12/now-with-more-linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drewperry.com/digidad/2008/12/now-with-more-linkedin/</link>
	<description>raising a family in the information age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.drewperry.com/digidad/2008/12/now-with-more-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 02:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewperry.com/blog/?p=214#comment-544</guid>
		<description>On the contrary, it&#039;s filled with professional individuals looking to network between companies and organizations. And it&#039;s completely functional. It&#039;s a site with a mission statement and it fulfills that statement completely. Facebook, on the other hand, is a distraction in a dotcom; rife with zombies, li&#039;l green patches, and hottie pricing. It&#039;s a social network, not a professional network. LinkedIn is a professional network. The difference to many is subtle, I&#039;m sure. And the y-gens might gloss it over wondering why you can&#039;t poke your boss or send possible employers flair. But trust me, it&#039;s fully functional and greatly populated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary, it&#8217;s filled with professional individuals looking to network between companies and organizations. And it&#8217;s completely functional. It&#8217;s a site with a mission statement and it fulfills that statement completely. Facebook, on the other hand, is a distraction in a dotcom; rife with zombies, li&#8217;l green patches, and hottie pricing. It&#8217;s a social network, not a professional network. LinkedIn is a professional network. The difference to many is subtle, I&#8217;m sure. And the y-gens might gloss it over wondering why you can&#8217;t poke your boss or send possible employers flair. But trust me, it&#8217;s fully functional and greatly populated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the fat friar</title>
		<link>http://www.drewperry.com/digidad/2008/12/now-with-more-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>the fat friar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drewperry.com/blog/?p=214#comment-547</guid>
		<description>so it&#039;s like facebook but without all the functionality and people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so it&#8217;s like facebook but without all the functionality and people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
